Go to the U of M home page
  • One Stop
  • MyU
Gender Policy Report
  • About
    • Curators
    • Write For Us
    • Email Sign-Up
  • Research Areas
    • Gender, Race & Place in Minnesota
    • Built & Natural Environment
    • Criminal Justice
    • Education
    • Health
    • Human Rights, Development & Security
    • Immigration & Refugees
    • Labor, Family & Economic Security
    • Leadership & Representation
    • Violence
  • Dialogues
    • Dialogues Archive
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Menu
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Mail

The US Withdrawal From UNESCO: Undermining Girls’ Education

By Frances Vavrus | October 18, 2017

The Trump administration has made yet another devastating decision undermining girls’ and women’s education, and this time its effects will be felt throughout the world. Last week, the White House revealed that the U.S. would withdraw its support from the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), an institution established in 1945 with the inauguration of the United Nations itself.

It is sadly ironic that the UNESCO announcement was made the day after the United Nations’ International Day of the Girl Child, an annual event on October 11 that draws attention to the challenges facing girls around the world and to advances in the achievement of their human rights.

Claiming the decision is due to UNESCO’s “anti-Israel bias,” it also provides further evidence of an administration opposed to multilateralism and ignorant of the vital role of UNESCO in promoting gender justice in education.

UNESCO’s work extends far beyond its most famous arm, the World Heritage Committee, which identifies and monitors World Heritage Sites. In fact, gender equality is one of UNESCO’s two “global priorities,” and its five primary objectives include the achievement of “quality education for all,” the development of “inclusive knowledge societies,” and the enhancement of “science knowledge and policy.”

UNESCO links its work on education and gender in a number of ways.

For instance, its Institute for Statistics plays a critical role in documenting gender gaps in access to education, and its International Bureau of Education works closely with governments and ministries of education to improve curriculum development, teacher education, and assessment. These efforts have resulted in the publication of numerous resources for educational practitioners and guidelines for policymakers. For example, UNESCO has recently been involved in the development of a resources to promote gender-responsive STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) curricula for African and Asian countries, and it partnered with UN Women to develop the Global Guidance on Addressing School-Related Gender-Based Violence report (2016), a comprehensive review of national policies and school-based practices in different countries aimed at creating safe spaces for all children.

UNESCO is among the most important multilateral institutions engaged in addressing gender equality in education around the world.

They and many others are working to ensure that the U.N. Sustainable Development Goals related to education (Goal 4) and gender equality (Goal 5) do not remain mere aspirations but are instead converted into policy and practice. The U.S. must remain a part of multilateral efforts to achieve these goals because it cannot claim to have achieved any of them, not quality schooling for all girls and boys as called for in Goal 4, or the elimination of gender-based violence and the provision of sexual and reproductive health services as demanded in Goal 5. By looking at the U.S. through an international lens, we see a nation whose administration is walking back from multilateral commitments to education and gender equity at a time when other nations are moving toward embracing them even more firmly.

Frances Vavrus is a Professor in the University of Minnesota’s Department of Organizational Leadership, Policy and Development where she serves in the Comparative and International Development Education (CIDE) program.

Photo originally appeared in Jolkona’s report on girls’ education in India

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)

Recent Posts

  • A Bigger Child Tax Credit Gives Families Flexibility
  • Hunger Games: Global Gender Bias Against Women’s Farming
  • From Warriors to Guardians, Race Shapes Police Masculinity
  • Even Before the Pandemic, Child Care Finances Were Broken
  • Women’s Arduous Climb Up the Corporate Ladder
  • Can a Resurgence in Labor Unions Help Working Women?

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommerical-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

HUMPHREY SCHOOL OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS

130 Humphrey School
301 19th Avenue South Minneapolis MN 55455
612-626-8910
hhh.umn.edu

Center on Women, Gender, and Public Policy

Illuminating gender-based disparities through research, teaching, and public engagement. cwgpp.umn.edu

Most Popular Posts

  • Bicycles, Gender, and Risk: Driver Behaviors When Passing Cyclists
  • Gender, Masculinity, and COVID-19
  • The Prison Rape Elimination Act and the Limits of Liberal Reform

Quick Links

  • About
  • Write for Us
  • Donate
  • Email Sign-Up

Write For Us

  • Click to Learn More

Social Media

Twitter   Facebook   Facebook

E-News

Sign-up to receive the lastest news from the Gender Policy Report.

© 2019 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved. The University of Minnesota is an equal opportunity educator and employer. Privacy Statement
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Mail
Scroll to top